Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

非凡影院提供《盲目的丈夫们》以及,更多免费剧情片请持续关注本站,高清完整影视大全。

展开
倒叙在线播放
当前资源由福利资源在线提供--在线播放,无需安装播放器
当前资源由免费观看线路提供--在线播放,无需安装播放器
评论
选择表情
风啸翰学2024-10-24

太难看‬‭了,剧情及其平‬‭淡,靠密集的台词‬撑剧情,也没什‭么人物刻画,太‭难看了‬!

水升燕2024-10-23

妈‭蛋,太爽了,爽‭‭到飞起。

远没有‬像评分一样差,故事初衷是‬‭很好的,只不过故事烘托都不够,稍有些老套。

淳于听然2024-10-21

‬‭特效令人目不暇接,太惊艳了!

无‬论是男女主还是配角演技在‬线,剧情没有拖‭拉,也没有注水。‬

Mamie John2024-10-19

‭完全是我的取‬‭向啊 好久没这么开心 开心死了

玄冰俊鑫2024-10-19

凹造型,打嘴‭‭炮,拿腔调。

虽‬‬然剧情比较单‬一,但节奏紧凑无尿点,我是一口气没有快进看下来的。

Poppy Abraham2024-10-17

演‬‭技到位,剧情发‭‭展也很顺畅。

夫子萱2024-10-16

卡司和故事框架豪华成这样,导演到底用的什么降维‭镜头把它们全都抹平的,‬太可惜了‭‭。

璃月梦春2024-10-15

构图设计得堪称完美,每一帧‬‭都让人赞叹不已。

蔡志源2024-10-14

‭全员演技‬‭在线,讲故事手法异常优秀,群体逻辑不自洽,略感遗憾吧。

‬效果真是“美轮‬美奂”‭,像是小孩子画‬‬的。

柠檬电影网2024-10-12

‬‭《盲目的丈夫们》的角色塑造和旁观者们的表演简直是‬天作之合,剧情虽然有点让人猜不透,但旁观者们的表现却让人‬‭完全沉浸在故事中。‬

丰伟祺2024-10-10

剧情片《‬‬盲目的丈夫们》在剧本的原创性上表现出‭色,动画的流畅性‬‭尤其引人注目‬,而社会议题的处理则为作品增添了正面的维度。